14.0
Fecal contamination of tidal creek sediments – links to sediment
phosphorus?
Lawrence
B. Cahoon and Byron Toothman
Dept. of Biological Sciences
UNC Wilmington
910-962-3706, Cahoon@uncw.edu
Introduction
Fecal
contamination of coastal waters is one of the most serious and well known forms
of pollution in our region, mandating closure of large areas to shellfishing and
creating a potential human health threat. In addition to shellfishing closures
in estuarine waters mandated by the N.C. Division of Shellfish Sanitation’s
routine sampling, surveys of tributaries to New Hanover County’s tidal creeks
show fecal contamination levels, expressed as counts of fecal coliform bacteria
(Colony Forming Units (CFU)/100 ml) that often exceed designated use standards (Mallin
et al., 2002). Much of the developed area of New Hanover County is served by a
central sewage system that has been relatively well tested and refined since its
installation, so animal wastes in storm water runoff are probably the most
common cause of fecal contamination in tidal creek waters. However, fecal
coliform contamination even in the absence of storm events and their immediate
runoff argues for persistence of these bacteria in tidal creek ecosystems.
Studies
of fecal coliform bacteria in coastal ecosystems have shown that levels of these
indicator bacteria in sediments may reach very high concentrations, and are
apparently maintained by favorable conditions (Rittenberg et al., 1958; Dale,
1974; Hood and Ness, 1982; Chamroux and Guichaou, 1987; Davies et al., 1995).
Our preliminary data from the Bradley Creek drainage showed fecal coliform
levels on the order of 106 CFU m-2 of sediment. These
observations suggested that fecal coliform bacteria may have a natural refuge in
tidal creek sediments, where they are shielded from harmful solar radiation,
obtain needed nutrients, and find surfaces on which to attach and survive or
even grow (Dale, 1974; Tate, 1978; Henis, 1987). Furthermore, even minor
sediment disturbance may suspend sufficient numbers of sediment-associated fecal
coliforms to cause non-attainment of use standards, even if no “new” fecal
coliforms have been washed into the system (Doyle, 1985; Gary and Adams, 1985;
Seyfried and Harris, 1986; Palmer, 1988; Struck, 1988; Pettibone et al., 1996).
Clearly, if such a source of fecal bacterial contamination is prevalent in our
coastal ecosystems, restoration of full use of these waters will be very
difficult.
Recent
research has shown that not all estuarine sediments support dense populations of
fecal coliform bacteria, so some factor(s) in addition to recruitment must act
to control the actual fecal coliform content of estuarine sediments (Dale, 1974;
Hood and Ness, 1982; Chamroux and Guichaou, 1987; Davies et al., 1995). Rowland
(2002) found that sediment phosphate levels were important in controlling fecal
coliform bacteria survival and growth in estuarine sediments. Phosphate loading
to estuarine waters is driven by storm water runoff and other sources that
covary with fecal coliform loading. Cahoon (2002) showed that residential use of
phosphate-containing fertilizers was a major source of phosphate to sediments in
tributaries in the Bradley Creek watershed. Consequently, fecal coliform
contamination of tidal creeks in New Hanover County may be driven by a complex
relationship between storm water runoff, animal sources of fecal matter, and
phosphate (and other nutrients) from fertilizers, all associated with
residential land uses.
Previous
studies of these problems supported by the New Hanover County Tidal Creeks
Program have shown that sediment fecal coliforms were present at concentrations
sufficient to drive closures to shellfishing and even swimming activities if
suspension into a water column 1 m deep of the observed coliforms occurred.
(Fig. 1).
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 1. Plot of
concentration of fecal coliforms if sediment coliforms were suspended in a 1 m
deep water column vs. sampling date (June 21 2001 to January 19 2002). Lines at
concentrations = 200 and 14 CFU/100 ml denote NC standards for human contact and
shellfishing, respectively.

_____________________________________________________________________
We
continued the investigation of linkages
between sediment phosphorus and sediment fecal coliform bacteria levels in New
Hanover County’s tidal creeks. The issues posed by these linkages obviously
have larger implications and pose broader questions than can be addressed by a
relatively limited project, but one significant and appropriate question has
been addressed in this study: Do sediment phosphorus levels show any correlation
with sediment fecal coliform levels?
Methods
Sampling
sites were located in the Bradley Creek drainage, using locations previously
sampled so as to maintain continuity (Fig. 2). These locations were sampled at
least monthly for sediment phosphorus, sediment fecal coliforms, temperature
and salinity. The top 2.0 centimeters of estuarine sediments were cored at
each site. Three sediment cores were taken randomly at each site using sterile
2.20 cm ID acrylic tubing for sediment fecal coliform analyses. Following
methods developed by Rowland (2002), each sample was transferred to a
previously weighed, sterile 50ml polypropylene centrifuge tube and placed on
ice. The three samples were each mixed with 1L of
Figure 2. Map showing sampling locations in the Bradley Creek
watershed, named for nearby streets or tributaries. A=Andover (BC-SBU), CR=Clear
Run (BC-CA), E=Eastwood (BC-NBU), M=Mallard (BC-CR), S=Softwind (BC-SB),
W=Wrightsville (BC-NB). North is up. See also Fig. 7.1.

_____________________________________________________________________
sterile phosphate-buffered
rinse water inside a sterile 1L flask with a stir bar. Each sample was gently
stirred for 2 minutes prior to performing the membrane filtration technique.
From the mixture of sterile phosphate-buffered rinse water and sediment, three
10 ml and three 1 ml samples were used for fecal coliform analysis using
standard methods for membrane filtration of fecal coliform bacteria, method
9.222 (APHA, 1998). The sediment and rinse water solution were mixed before each
sample withdrawal to reduce fecal coliform burial and homogenize the bacteria
suspension. All plates were incubated in a water bath for 24 hours at 44.5° C.
After the 24-hour incubation period, each plate was inspected for dark blue
colonies. Each dark blue colony represented one colony-forming unit (CFU).
Counts from each 10ml sample from each of the three cores from each site were
averaged and expressed as the number of colony forming units per square
centimeter (CFU cm-2) + one std. dev.
Sediment
phosphate was analyzed on a second triplicate set of sediment cores taken
randomly at each sampling site simultaneously with fecal coliform samples.
Sub-samples of dried sediments were weighed and analyzed for phosphate content
following digestion with the persulfate-boric acid method of Valderrama (1981).
This method oxidizes relatively labile forms of phosphorus to orthophosphate,
and likely represents reasonably accurately the bio-available phosphorus in
sediments, in contrast to more robust extraction and digestion methods that
likely quantify additional phosphorus that may be less bio-available. Sediment
phosphate content was expressed as ug
P (g sediment)-1.
Results
The
concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria in sediments of Bradley Creek were
highly variable, ranging from values of 0 to over 3,000 CFU cm-2 in a
total of 65 samples collected between January and November, 2003. The arithmetic
mean value observed was 265 CFU cm-2 overall, which corresponds to a
value of 265 CFU per 100 mls if all these bacteria were suspended in a water
column 1 meter deep, a value high enough to close the water to human body
contact. The standard for shellfishing is much lower, 14 CFU per 100 mls; 49 of
the 65 samples exceeded this value using analogous assumptions. Mean values for
the respective sampling sites were similarly higher than the human body contact
standard, except for the site at Clear Run Branch (BC-CR, “CR” in Fig. 2)
(Table 1). Thus, the levels of fecal coliform bacteria measured in Bradley
Creek’s sediments frequently represent serious potential problems for human
uses of these waters.
Table
1. Concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria in sediments at sampling
sites within the Bradley Creek drainage, CFU cm-2. Site
designations as in Fig. 2.
Site
Mean
303
40
418
429
250
145
Range
2.5-1630
0-234
20.3-1660 10.2-3271
7.6-1820
0-325
There
was no clear relationship between sediment fecal coliform bacteria
concentrations and sediment phosphorus levels (Fig. 3). Occasional high values
of
Fig. 3. Bradley
Creek sediment fecal coliforms vs. sediment phosphorus concentrations.

Although an effect of
salinity, either as a stressor for fecal bacteria or as a proxy for distance or
transit time from their warm-blooded host sources, was expected, no clear
relationship was detected between these two parameters, either (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Bradley
Creek sediment fecal coliforms vs. salinity.

Again, additional data and
more sophisticated analysis would help resolve any relationship if one exists.
Fig. 5. Bradley
Creek sediment fecal coliforms vs. water temperature.

Temperature appeared to
have had an effect on the concentrations of sediment fecal bacteria. Fecal
bacteria concentrations were lowest at low temperatures and generally highest at
intermediate temperatures. Very low temperatures are known to limit growth rates
of fecal coliform bacteria, which grow optimally at the body temperatures of
warm-blooded host organisms. High temperatures may be stressful in the absence
of sufficient nutrients and organic substrates.
Additional
data and analysis will be required to evaluate interactions of the factors
considered above in controlling the concentrations of sediment fecal coliform
bacteria. It is also likely that other parameters, such as the availability of
labile organic substrates, may be important.
Discussion
Sediments
in the Bradley Creek drainage frequently harbored significant populations of
fecal coliform bacteria, particularly during the warmer times of the year when
children are most likely to play in these waters. As other studies have shown
that fecal coliform bacteria concentrations in sediments do indicate the
presence of other fecal pathogens (Rittenberg et al., 1958; Lipp et al., 2001),
it is important to consider the public health risk associated with this poorly
known reservoir of contaminants. Many water-borne diseases are not properly
tracked to their sources, so a significant problem may be occurring without real
awareness of its cause.
Given
the attributes of the Bradley Creek watershed, it is likely that animals, both
wild and domestic, were the most important fecal contamination sources. One
conclusion, therefore, is that pet waste management should be addressed for all
residential areas in coastal watersheds, not just beach communities. Moreover, a
significant population of “wildlife” that actually associates with human
communities, eating human garbage and unsecured pet foods, such as raccoons and
opossums, likely lives in this watershed and contributes to the fecal
contamination problem. Educational efforts can reduce this problem as well. It
is important to note that animal wastes can be as dangerous a source of
pathogens to humans as human waste, particularly because some of the
animal-derived pathogens, such as infectious protozoans, can cause infections
that are difficult to diagnose and treat. For example, an AP story published
recently in the Wilmington Star-News discussed how infections from a widely
distributed pathogenic amoeba, Naegleria fowleri, have caused fatal brain
inflammations in swimmers.
Data
generated by this effort and the previous study (Rowland 2002), which provided
the data in Fig. 1, have also supported a successful proposal to UNC Sea Grant
for a much more thorough study of the main hypothesis and other issues addressed
in this study. This research project will begin in February, 2004, and will
include an effort to examine a much larger suite of parameters that may affect
fecal coliform concentrations in tidal creek sediments.
Literature
Cited
APHA. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste
water, 20th ed. American Public Health Association. Washington, D.C.,
A.E. Greenberg, ed.
Cahoon, L.B. 2002. Residential land use,
fertilizer, and soil phosphorus as a phosphorus source to surface drainages in
New Hanover County, North Carolina. Journal of the N.C. Academy of Science
118(3):156-166.
Chamroux, S.
and C. Guichaou. 1987. The role of sediment in maintaining the presence
of pollution in coastal waters. Ecological Management Of The Sea 14:45-49.
Dale, N.G.
1974. Bacteria in intertidal sediments: factors related to their
distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr.
19:509-518
Davies,
C.M., J.A. Long, M. Donald, and N.J. Ashbolt. 1995. Survival of fecal
microorganisms in marine and freshwater sediments.
App. Env. Microbiol. 61:1888-1896.
Doyle,
J.D. 1985. Analyses of recreational water quality as related to sediment
resuspension. Dissertation
Abstracts International. Part B.
Science and Engineering. Vol. 6, No.4
pp 79.
Gary, H.L. and J.C. Adams.
1985. Indicator bacteria in water and stream sediments near the Snowy Range in
Southern Wyoming. Water Air Soil Pollut. 25:133-144.
Henis,
Y, ed. 1987. Survival and dormancy of microorganisms.
New York: John
Hood,
M.A., and G.E. Ness. 1982. Survival of Vibrio
cholerae and Escherichia coli in estuarine waters and sediments. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 43:578-584.
Lipp, E.K., R.
Kurz, R. Vincent, C. Rodriguez-Palacios, S.R. Farrah, and J.B. Rose. 2001. The
effects of seasonal variability and weather on microbial fecal pollution and
enteric pathogens in a subtropical estuary. Estuaries 24:266-276.
Mallin,
M.A., L.B. Cahoon, M.H. Posey, L.A. Leonard, D.C. Parsons, V.L. Johnson, E.J.
Wambach, T.D. Alphin, K.A. Nelson, and J.F. Merritt. 2002. Environmental quality
of Wilmington and New Hanover County watersheds. CMS Report 02-01.
Palmer,
M. 1988. Bacterial loadings from resuspended sediments in recreational beaches.
Can. J.
Civ. Eng. 15:450-455.
Pettibone, G.W., K.N. Irvine, and K.M. Monohan. 1996. Impact of a ship
passage on bacteria levels and suspended sediment characteristics in the Buffalo
River, New York. Water Res.
30:2517-2521.
Rittenberg, S.C., T. Mittwer, and O. Ivier. 1958. Coliform bacteria in
sediments around three marine sewage outfalls. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3:101-108.
Rowland,
K.R. 2002. Survival of sediment-bound fecal coliform bacteria and potential
pathogens in relation to phosphate concentration in estuarine sediments.
Unpublished M.S. thesis, UNC Wilmington, Wilmington, N.C.
Seyfried,
P.L., and E.M. Harris. 1986. Detailed bacteriological water quality study
examining the impact of sediment and survival times.
Technology Transfer Conference. Part
B: Water Quality Research. pp.
347-391.
Struck,
P.H. 1988. Relationship between sediment and fecal coliform levels in a Puget
Sound Estuary. J. Env. Health. 50:403-407.
Tate,
R.L., III. 1978. Cultural and environment factors affecting the longevity of Escherichia
coli in Histosols. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:925-929.
Valderrama,
J.C. 1981. The simultaneous analysis of total nitrogen and phosphorus in natural
waters. Mar. Chem. 10:109-122.