3.0
Bradley Creek
The Bradley Creek watershed is of particular current interest as a principal location for Clean Water Trust Fund mitigation activities, including the purchase and renovation of Airlie Gardens by the County. This creek is one of the most polluted in New Hanover County, particularly by fecal coliform bacteria (Mallin et al. 2000b). Seven stations were sampled in the past year, both fresh and brackish (Fig. 3.1).
As with last year, turbidity was not a major problem during 2003-2004 (Table
3.1). The standard of 25 NTU
was exceeded twice at the upper north branch (November and December, 58 and 45
NTU, respectively) and once at the north branch (BC-NB) in December 2003 (37 NTU
- Table 3.1). There were only minor
problems with low dissolved oxygen (hypoxia), with BC-76 having DO of less than
5.0 mg/L on two occasions and BC-CA having substandard dissolved oxygen
conditions on three of seven sampling occasions (Appendix
B).
Table 3.1 Water quality parameter concentrations at Bradley Creek sampling stations, August 2003-July 2004. Data as mean (SD) / range, fecal coliform bacteria as geometric mean / range; (for BC-CA, n = 7 months).
_____________________________________________________________________
Station
Salinity
Turbidity
Dissolved Oxygen Fecal coliforms
(ppt)
(NTU)
(mg/L)
(CFU/100 mL)
_____________________________________________________________________
BC-76
30.1 (5.0)
5 (3)
7.5 (2.4)
NA
18.6-36.4
0-13
4.5-11.3
BC-SB
8.0 (9.6)
7 (4)
8.0 (2.2)
NA
0.1-27.3
3-18
3.6-11.1
BC-SBU
0.1 (0.0)
4 (5)
8.1 (1.8)
NA
0.1-0.1
1-19
4.5-11.7
BC-NB
15.9 (13.0)
10 (9)
7.3 (2.1)
NA
0.2-33.2
1-37
4.8-11.1
BC-NBU
0.1 (0.0)
15 (19)
7.7 (1.1)
NA
0.1-0.2
1-58
6.4-9.5
BC-CR
0.1 (0.0)
3 (3)
7.9 (0.7)
NA
0.1-0.1
0-8
6.5-9.1
BC-CA
0.1 (0.0)
7 (7)
6.4 (2.7)
807
0.1-0.2
1-22
4.3-11.4
60-6000
_____________________________________________________________________
Only BC-CA was
sampled for fecal coliform concentrations last year, with elevated counts
exceeding the State standard of 200 CFU/100 mL occurring during six of seven
collections for an 86% exceedence rate (Table 3.1).
We consider BC-CA to have poor water quality in terms of fecal coliform
counts (Appendix B).
Nitrate concentrations were highest at stations BC-CR, BC-SBU (upper
south branch) and BC-NBU. Nitrate
decreased slightly in the south branch in comparison to the previous year. Ammonium was elevated at BC-CA, but low at other
locations. The highest
orthophosphate levels were found at BC-CA, with relatively low orthophosphate
levels at the rest of the stations (Table 3.2).
Bradley Creek did not host excessive algal blooms in 2003-2004, except
for a minor bloom in June at BC-SB (24.3 mg/L)
and a major bloom (40.3 mg/L)
in June at BC-CA (Table 3.2).
Table 3.2.
Nutrient and chlorophyll a data
at Bradley Creek sampling stations, August 2003-July 2004. Data as mean (SD) / range, nutrients in mg/L, chlorophyll a
as
mg/L.
_____________________________________________________________________
Station
Nitrate
Ammonium
Orthophosphate
Chlorophyll a
_____________________________________________________________________
BC-76
0.015 (0.012)
0.023
(0.015)
0.012
(0.006)
1.2 (0.7)
0.003-0.042
0.008-0.049
0.005-0.023
0.3-2.2
BC-SB
0.070 (0.060)
0.024
(0.013)
0.013
(0.010)
5.1
(7.3)
0.003-0.169
0.008-0.041
0.005-0.044
0.6-24.7
BC-SBU
0.083 (0.033)
NA
0.011 (0.011)
2.3
(3.1)
0.054-0.171
0.006-0.044
0.3-11.2
BC-NB
0.042 (0.051)
0.029
(0.022)
0.011
(0.008)
3.7
(3.6)
0.003-0.156
0.008-0.072
0.003-0.028
0.6-10.9
BC-NBU
0.087 (0.018)
NA
0.005 (0.005)
0.5 (0.4)
0.062-0.123
0.002-0.020
0.1-1.2
BC-CR
0.274 (0.047)
NA
0.007 (0.006)
0.4
(0.4)
0.154-0.317
0.002-0.024
0.1-1.5
BC-CA
0.085 (0.109)
0.121
(0.055)
0.019
(0.016)
11.2
(14.3)
0.013-0.330
0.040-0.190
0.005-0.040
1.5-40.3
_____________________________________________________________________