3.4
Cape Fear River Subbasin 03-06-17
Includes Town Creek, Smith Creek and the Brunswick River
Municipalities: City of Wilmington and Town of Southport
LCFRP Station Codes (DWQ #): LVC
(74), AC (61), DP (92), IC (71), NAV (72),
HB (73), BRR (75), M61 (86), M54 (87), M42 (88), M35 (89), M23 (90), M18 (91),
SPD (93)
DWQ/UNCW ambient monitoring site(s): NAV,
M61, M54
Waterbody: Lower Cape Fear River
and Estuary
Location: Lower
Cape Fear River including Livingston Creek, downstream to
estuarine area off
Town of Southport
Lat/Lon: N
34.35180 W 78.20128
(LVC)
N 33.91708
W 78.03717
(SPD)
![]() |
Use Support Ratings, from NCDENR, DWQ (Cape
Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, July 2000):
Freshwater Streams
Fully Supporting:
251.5 mi.
Partially Supporting:
3.8 mi.
Not Supporting:
0.0 mi.
Not Rated:
65.5 mi.
Estuarine Waters
Fully Supporting:
16,314 ac.
Partially Supporting:
7,211 ac.
Not Supporting:
0.0 ac.
Not Rated:
925 ac.
This
subbasin is located in the outer coastal plain and in estuarine regions of the
basin. Significant dischargers in this subbasin are the City of
Wilmington and the Town of Southport. There
are 49 permitted dischargers in the subbasin; half of which discharge directly
into the Cape Fear River. The
largest dischargers are International Paper, Wilmington North Side WWTP and
Wilmington South Side WWTP. (NCDENR,
DWQ Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, July 2000)
Portions of Livingston Creek, the Cape Fear River and estuarine areas were
identified as impaired in the 1996 Basinwide Water Quality Plan (NCDENR, DWQ).
Currently Livingston Creek is listed as fully supporting (FS) and is no
longer on the 303(d) list of impaired waters.
The Cape Fear River is currently partially supporting (PS), because of an
impaired biological community. The
International Paper Board discharge and nonpoint source pollution are possible
causes of impairment, and this segment of the river is on the state’s year
2000 303(d) list. The Cape Fear
River Estuary (5000 acres) is partially supporting (PS) and is on the state’s
year 2000 303(d) list. The
cumulative impacts from WWTP discharges in the subbasin as well as nonpoint
source pollution are suspected to be the significant contributors to the
impairment. Swamp water drainage
may also be a source of low dissolved oxygen (DO) waters feeding into the
estuary. Possible sources of
nonpoint source pollution include marinas, canal systems, and septic systems.
(NCDENR, DWQ Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, July 2000)
Approximately 45% of the waters in this subbasin are impaired by nonpoint source
pollution. All the waters of the subbasin are affected by nonpoint
sources. The 303(d) list approach
will be to develop a TMDL for this segment of the Cape Fear River because of low
DO levels. Because of the nature of
the river/estuary system in this portion of the basin, addressing water quality
issues must not be limited to problems in impaired segments alone.
Because this segment of the river and estuary are impaired, issuance of
new and expanding discharges that would further increase the load of
oxygen-consuming waste into these waters will be considered on a case by case
basis. (NCDENR, DWQ,
Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan, July 2000)
UNC-Wilmington
– Center for Marine Science, LCFRP
Station Names: LVC, AC, DP, IC, NAV,
HB, BRR, M61, M54, M42, M35, M23, M18, SPD
Data collection: some stations
since 1995, all sampled since 1998
Sampling relevance: below point
source dischargers, including City of Wilmington,
and nonpoint source pollution
AC -
representative of riverine system
stations, low salinity, fairly narrow
channel

HB -
riverine station, upstream of Wilmington, shows
change of landscape
from upland forested areas
to more open, wider river channel

M35
-
representative of the estuarine
stations, wider channel, strong tidal influence
Most
sites within this subbasin were fully supporting (FS) for dissolved oxygen.
Exceptions were Indian Creek (IC), which was partially supporting (PS)
for dissolved oxygen. The state
standard of 5.0 mg/L was not met 25% of the time. Also Navassa (NAV) had low dissolved oxygen in several summer
samples. It was rated by UNCW as
non supporting (NS) due to dissolved oxygen levels, which were lower than 5.0
mg/L in 33% of the monthly sampling trips (Figure 3.4.1). In summer months, all of the riverine stations in this
subbasin are monitored weekly, and the estuary stations are monitored biweekly.
Low dissolved oxygen levels are a concern during summer months because
there is generally less rain, more transpiration, lower flow levels, and the
warmer waters hold less dissolved oxygen than colder waters.
The summer values are represented graphically in Figure 3.4.2.
All
sites were found to be fully supporting (FS) for chlorophyll a
concentrations. No samples exceeded
the North Carolina State Standard for chlorophyll a of 40 mg/L.
Most
sites within the subbasin were found to be fully supporting (FS) for fecal
coliform bacteria concentrations, when measured by the North Carolina State
Standard for human contact of 200 CFU/100 mL.
The only exception was Horseshoe Bend (HB), which was rated as partially
supporting (PS), with samples exceeding the standard 25% of the time.
The North Carolina State Standard for fecal coliform bacteria for
shellfishing waters is no more than 14 CFU/100 mL.
When looking at this subbasin from a shellfishing perspective, the middle
estuary stations (from river channel marker 42 (M42) and upstream) were non
supporting (NS) due to high fecal coliform bacteria concentrations.
The lower estuary stations (from river channel marker 35 (M35) and
downstream) were rated as fully supporting (FS) for shellfishing.
The higher salinities found in the lower estuary significantly increase
mortality of fecal coliform bacteria.
Most
sites within this subbasin were found to be fully supporting (FS) for turbidity,
rarely exceeding the North Carolina State Standard for brackish waters of 25 NTU.
The exceptions were the Brunswick River (BRR) site, and river channel
marker 54 (M54) site, both of which were found to be partially supporting (PS).
These two sites had turbidity levels that exceeded the state standard 17%
of the time, with means of 16 NTU and 15 NTU respectively.
Figure
3.4.1 Dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg/L) are shown for river
and estuary
stations DP, IC, NAV, M61. The line
shows the NC State Standard of 5.0 mg/L, and
the dashed line shows the NC State Standard for swampwater of 4.0 mg/L.
Figure
3.4.2 Dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg/L) in summer months,
weekly
sampling of DP, IC, and NAV; and biweekly sampling of M61. The line
shows the
NC State Standard of 5.0 mg/L and the dashed line shows the NC State Standard
for swampwater of 4.0 mg/L.