WATER QUALITY IN THE LOWER CAPE FEAR RIVER SYSTEM, 1996-1997
by
Michael A. Mallin, Martin H. Posey, Mary L. Moser, G.
Christopher Shank,
Matthew R. McIver, Troy D. Alphin, Scott H. Ensign and James F. Merritt
Under the auspices of the Cape Fear River Program a
broad-scale water sampling program in the Cape Fear watershed was begun in June 1995.
Thirty-four stations throughout the estuary and the lower Cape Fear, Black, and Northeast
Cape Fear Rivers were sampled monthly. Data were collected for a variety of physical,
chemical, and biological parameters and results are presented within. A broad-scale
analysis of the lower riverine and estuarine benthic invertebrate communities is also
presented, as is a winter-spring analysis of the fish communities in the lower rivers.
During both the summer of 1995 and 1996 there were substandard (<
5.0 mg/L) dissolved oxygen concentrations in the lower Cape Fear River and upper estuary,
lasting several months. Data indicate that both industrial BOD and natural swamp water
inputs contribute to this situation. Because of the well-mixed condition of the rivers
dissolved oxygen vertical stratification does not occur; rather, hypoxic conditions are
found throughout the water column. In 1996 this condition was exacerbated by Hurricane
Fran, and levels at or approaching anoxia were found in some locations. Turbidity is
another physical problem in the mainstem and the estuary, where both the freshwater and
brackish water standards are exceeded at times. One major source of turbidity is non-point
source runoff flowing into the mainstem and reaching the estuary following rain events
upstream. Another source is estuarine dredging, which is permitted in winter. Turbidity
can be problematic in that it interferes with rooted aquatic plant photosynthesis and
feeding of fish and shellfish, and can transport fecal coliform bacteria, nutrients, and
contaminants far downstream from their point of entry into the stream. The Black and
Northeast Cape Fear Rivers maintain low turbidity as a result of their lowland origins and
extensive streamside wetlands which filter the water.
Inorganic nutrients (nitrate and orthophosphate) are general high in
the mainstem of the Cape Fear, indicating significant non-point source inputs upstream.
Nutrients in the blackwater tributaries were lower in concentration and had a greater
percent in the organic form, demonstrating the value of riparian wetlands as filters and
transformers of inorganic nutrients. Analysis of tributary streams showed instances where
high concentrations of total nitrogen and phosphorus were contributed to the watershed by
point sources from municipal (up to 7.6 mg/L TN and 1.5 mg/L TP) and industrial (up to
14.9 mg/L TN and 2.3 mg/L TP) wastewater effluents.
Chlorophyll a concentrations were generally low to moderate in
the Cape Fear system, because of high flow conditions, and elevated turbidity and water
color reducing available light for photosynthesis. Additionally, the very well mixed
nature of the river and estuary creates unfavorable conditions for surface algal bloom
formation. Fecal coliform concentrations were usually within state standards for human
contact waters in the riverine and estuarine stations. The lower estuary stations were
often above the standard for safe shellfishing, however. Some tributary streams had
problematic fecal coliform levels at times, including Little Rockfish Creek, Burgaw Creek,
Browns Creek and Hammonds Creek. Five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) was
generally low at all stations tested in the mainstem Cape Fear and the two major
blackwater tributaries. There was a 15% increase in BOD5 and a 17% increase in BOD20
between stations 3 miles upstream and 3 miles downstream of the International Paper mill
in Riegelwood, indicating industrial inputs of BOD. BOD5 concentrations 6 times higher
than normal occurred in the Northeast Cape Fear River following Hurricane Fran, but
significant increases did not occur at the other stations.
Analysis of waterborne metals indicated that arsenic, cadmium and lead
concentrations were below state standards at all stations on all sampling occasions.
Samples exceeding state standards for mercury were found on occasion throughout the
system, and samples exceeding standards for iron and zinc were frequently encountered
systemwide. Periodically some samples displayed elevated concentrations of chromium,
copper and nickel, mainly in the lower estuary at locations near Sunny Point and
Southport. Little Rockfish Creek was the tributary station which had the most problematic
metals concentrations.
The results of the first year of sampling infauna and epibenthos
indicate that the species comprising these groups, their distributions, and seasonal
patterns in the Cape Fear River Estuary are similar to those of other river-dominated
estuaries in the southeastern and mid-Atlantic United States. As is typical of these
estuaries, the fauna is dominated by a variety of widely occurring and opportunistic
species that are capable of quick recovery from a variety of disturbances. However, strong
responses in the infaunal and epifaunal communities to Hurricane Fran emphasize that the
estuarine system was negatively affected by upstream inputs, possibly with strong
ecosystem consequences, and that long-term trends in estuarine health need to be closely
monitored.
Variability in fish abundance and diversity was high during the short
period of time that fisheries have been monitored thus far. Nevertheless, both gillnet and
trawl collections indicated that fish abundance and diversity were lower in the Northeast
Cape Fear River stations than in the mainstem Cape Fear River stations. Overall disease
incidence was 2.1%. Disease incidence was higher (4.3%) in electroshock collections which
targeted adult, resident species, and no disease was noted in trawl collections which
target juveniles and non-resident species. The numerical dominance of non-native species
in gillnet collections indicates that these species are proliferating throughout the
drainage.
The main impact of Hurricane Bertha on water quality was to cause
reductions in dissolved oxygen, which subsequently recovered by late August to normal
levels. Hurricane Fran, however, had a major systemwide impact on dissolved oxygen, BOD,
nutrient concentrations, and water clarity. There was systemwide flooding of swampwater
into main river channels during and after this hurricane. Analysis of data indicated that
effects on the Northeast Cape Fear River were more severe and longer lasting than any of
the other locations. In this watershed several swine waste lagoons breached or were
inundated, introducing large quantities of labile BOD, phosphorus and ammonia into the
river. The mainstem Cape Fear and the Black River were affected by millions of gallons of
inadequately treated human sewage, routed into the rivers because of power losses to
treatment facilities and pump stations. Benthic communities were variably affected by
Hurricane Fran, with significant population reductions in the Northeast Cape Fear River
and at a mid-estuary site. Effects on benthos were less severe and less long-lasting in
the lower mainstem Cape Fear River and the lower estuary. There are no pre-hurricane
fisheries data to make comparisons with. However, both gillnet and trawl data indicated
higher fish abundance and diversity in the mainstem Cape Fear River than in the Northeast
Cape Fear River. The severe and prolonged anoxia following Hurricane Fran in this
tributary may be responsible for this difference.
| 1.0 Introduction 1 Site Description |
2.0 Physical, Chemical
and Biological Parameters 1 Introduction 2 Materials and Methods 3 Results and Discussion Tables (page 2) and Graphs |
| 3.0 Benthos 1 Background 2 Methodology 3 Results and Discussion 4 Summary Tables |
4.0 Fisheries 1 Introduction 2 Methods 3 Results 4 Discussion Tables |
| 5.0 Hurricane
Effects on Water Quality and Benthos in the Cape Fear Basin 1 Introduction 2 Sampling Locations 3 Methods 4 Results 5 Discussion 6 Environmental Policy and Hurricane Effects Tables and Graphs |
6.0 References Cited |
| 7.0 Acknowledgments |
**Any tables or figures not included on this site are available in hard copy from the Center for Marine Science at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington**