| |
02.210 |
|
HARASSMENT
RESOLUTION PROCEDURES |
 |
| |
Authority: |
|
Chancellor |
|
| |
History: |
|
Revised
May 5, 2005; supersedes prior Appendix J- Administrative Review Procedure
for Investigating Complaints Pertaining to Sexual Harassment, Improper
Personal Relationships Policy, Personal Discrimination, Unlawful Workplace
Harassment, or Workplace Violence. |
|
| |
Source of Authority: |
|
UNC Code,
Section 502 |
|
| |
Related Links: |
|
Harassment
Prevention Policy; SPA Grievance and Appeal Procedure; Code
of Student Life |
|
| |
Responsible Office(s): |
|
Human Resources;
Dean of Students |
|
|
| I. |
|
|
Purpose |
| |
|
These procedures are intended
to provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of harassment.
These procedures apply to all university students, agents, and employees,
including full and part-time students, graduate and undergraduate;
and full, part-time and temporary employees, including faculty,
EPA professionals, and SPA employees, as well as visitors. The university
recognizes that there are multiple avenues for resolving harassment
concerns, from informal means and mediation to formal investigations.
The university encourages individuals who believe that they are
the subject of harassment to report incidents in accordance with
these procedures.
|
| II. |
|
|
Confidentiality |
| |
|
|
The university shall protect
the privacy and confidentiality of individuals both reporting and
individuals who are alleged to have harassed to the extent allowed
by law. However, once a university official has actual knowledge of
allegations which may be serious enough to constitute a violation
of the university’s harassment prevention policy, the university’s
legal obligations require it to investigate under the formal procedures
described below in Sections VII or VIII. If an individual desires
complete confidentiality and does not want such an investigation,
he or she should consult with individuals, who by law have special
professional status, such as mental health counselors, physicians,
clergy, or private attorneys. |
| III. |
|
|
Administrative Responsibility |
| |
|
|
Vice chancellors, deans, directors,
department chairs, or supervisors who become aware of specific allegations
of harassment, must report the allegations promptly either to the
Human Resources Director/Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative
Action Officer (“EEO/AA officer”) or the Dean of Students,
as appropriate based on the status of the alleged offender.
|
| IV. |
|
|
Retaliation Prohibited |
| |
|
|
Any act by a university employee,
agent, or student of reprisal, interference, restraint, discrimination,
coercion or harassment against any person using these procedures shall
constitute a policy violation and shall be subject to prompt and appropriate
disciplinary action. |
| V. |
|
|
Other Remedies |
| |
|
|
A. |
The existence of these
procedures does not prohibit individuals from also filing claims
under Title VII (Civil Rights Act of 1964) with the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission or under Title IX (Education Amendments of
1972) with the Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education.
|
| |
|
|
B. |
SPA employees may file a grievance under the Unlawful
Workplace Harassment section of the SPA Grievance and Appeal Policy.
This is the required procedure for SPA employees who desire to maintain
their appeal rights through the Office of Administrative Hearings
of the State Personnel Commission. To use this procedure, the SPA
employee must submit a written grievance to Human Resources within
thirty (30) calendar days of the alleged harassment. SPA employees
who do not submit a written grievance to Human Resources within
this time frame may still utilize the formal resolution procedures
for resolving their concerns as stated below but will not have the
option of later appealing to the Office of Administrative Hearings
or using any other university appeal procedures.
|
| VI. |
|
|
Informal Resolution |
| |
|
|
A. |
In deciding whether to pursue informal means, including
mediation, the affected individual is encouraged to seek the assistance
of representatives in the Office of the Dean of Students, Housing
and Residence Life staff, Student Health Services, the Counseling
Center or Human Resources. These offices are available to assist
the affected individual in crafting the message to send to the offending
individual, as well as recommending other informal mechanisms and
setting up mediation. Whichever office the affected individual elects
to discuss his/her concerns with, the issue of confidentiality should
be addressed before specific facts or identities are disclosed due
to the university’s legal obligations to investigate all allegations
that may constitute harassment as defined in the university’s
harassment prevention policy.
|
| |
|
|
B. |
Harassment concerns may be resolved through
a variety of informal mechanisms, including but not limited to the
following:
1. Telling the alleged offender his or her behavior is unwelcome
and must stop.
2. Asking for an apology and a commitment that the behavior will
stop.
3. Sending a copy of the university’s harassment prevention
policy to the alleged offender.
4. Writing to the alleged offender regarding the conduct, pointing
out the effects of such behavior, and explaining the behavior
change desired.
5. Having the pertinent supervisor to counsel the alleged offender
about appropriate behaviors and conduct expectations.
6. Seeking to mediate the concern.
|
| VII. |
|
|
Formal Resolution: Student Initiated Harassment |
| |
|
|
Complaints about students
must be presented to the Office of the Dean of Students. The Dean
of Students, or designee, shall investigate and take appropriate
disciplinary action commensurate with the severity and/or frequency
of the conduct. Discipline resulting from student harassment shall
be taken in accordance with the procedures provided in The Code
of Student Life.
|
| VIII. |
|
|
Formal Resolution:
Employee or Other Non-Student Initiated Harassment |
| |
|
|
A. |
A complaint must be presented within ninety (90)
calendar days of the alleged harassing incident to the EEO/AA officer.
If filed later than ninety calendar (90) days, the EEO/AA officer
may extend the time limit based on extenuating circumstances and
at his/her sole discretion. If the allegations are against the EEO/AA
officer, the complainant may present the complaint to the general
counsel for investigation and resolution.
|
| |
|
|
B. |
Complainants are not required to provide
a signed, written statement describing their complaint; though such
documentation is strongly encouraged. If the complainant conveys
the allegations verbally, the EEO/AA officer, or designee, shall
document the complaint and have the complainant review and sign
the documentation to indicate that it is accurate and complete.
|
| |
|
|
C. |
Depending on the nature and severity
of the allegations, the university may be obligated to investigate
a complaint of harassment without a signed, written statement once
the university has actual notice of possible harassment. Under Title
IX, the university is legally obligated to take prompt and remedial
measures to end harassment of a student, even if the student does
not make a complaint or otherwise requests action to be taken.
|
| |
|
|
D. |
The EEO/AA officer, or designee, shall
determine whether the allegations fall within the scope of the university’s
harassment prevention policy. If the determination is that the policy
is implicated, the EEO/AA officer, or designee(s), shall investigate
promptly.
|
| |
|
|
E. |
At a minimum, the investigator(s)
shall provide for an interview of the complainant and the respondent.
Witnesses should also be interviewed, and any relevant documentary
evidence shall be reviewed. The investigator(s) shall take notes
of all individuals who are interviewed. The investigator(s) shall
instruct individuals that retaliation is prohibited and is a violation
of university policy and the law. The individuals shall also be
instructed about the confidentiality and privacy parameters of the
investigation.
|
| |
|
|
F. |
Both the complainant and the respondent
may be accompanied when interviewed by another member of the university
community, so long as the individual does not interfere with the
interview. This person’s role is simply as an observer. Representation
by legal counsel during the interview is prohibited.
|
| |
|
|
G. |
Upon completion of the investigation,
the investigator(s) shall prepare a written report of the factual
findings and a conclusion about whether a policy violation has been
committed. The EEO/AA officer shall forward the report to the pertinent
senior officer in the unit where the respondent is employed.
|
| |
|
|
H. |
In the event that a violation of the
university’s harassment prevention policy is found, the pertinent
senior officer shall determine the appropriate disciplinary action,
in consultation with the EEO/AA officer, and in accordance with
the appropriate disciplinary procedures pertaining to the affected
individual (e.g. Section 603 of the Code of the Board of Governors
for imposition of serious sanctions against a faculty member; SPA
Grievance Procedure; or EPA Grievance Procedure). Any prior violations
of the harassment prevention policy involving the respondent shall
be considered in any disciplinary action.
|
| |
|
|
I. |
The complainant and the respondent
shall be informed immediately when the investigation is completed.
Results of the investigation, the report, and any subsequent disciplinary
action shall be kept confidential to the extent allowed by the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”) and the
North Carolina Personnel Records Act.
|
| IX. |
|
|
Record Keeping |
| |
|
|
A. |
The Human Resources Office shall retain
all records of the investigation in a confidential file.
|
| |
|
|
B. |
The EEO/AA officer and the Dean of
Students shall provide statistics on an annual basis to the chancellor
of the number of incidents that have been investigated under the
formal resolution procedures.
|
| X. |
|
|
Appeal Procedures |
| |
|
|
A. |
The grounds for appeal by the complainant
or the respondent may be for only these reasons:
1. The harassment is ongoing;
2. The remedy was not implemented;
3. Material procedural irregularities occurred during the investigation;
or
4. New evidence has been discovered that had not been available
during the investigation
|
| |
|
|
B. |
Dissatisfaction with the university’s
conclusion from the formal resolution procedures is not grounds
for an appeal. Appeals of any disciplinary action must be taken
in accordance with the SPA grievance procedures, the EPA grievance
procedures, or Section 603 of the Code of the Board of Governors,
as appropriate.
|
| |
|
|
C. |
A written appeal statement must be
filed within thirty (30) calendar days after notice that the investigation
has been completed. The statement must be sent to the EEO/AA officer.
|
| |
|
|
D. |
Appeal statements must include a copy
of the original complaint, a summary of efforts to resolve the harassment,
and the grounds for the appeal.
|
| |
|
|
E. |
The pertinent Vice Chancellor, or designee,
shall review the appeal with the EEO/AA officer and make a decision.
The decision must be in writing and sent to the complainant in a matter
which ensures receipt. This decision constitutes a final university
decision. |
| |
|
|
|
|