University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Modified Version of 1990 Self Study Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSES AND GOALS OF THE SELF-STUDY
Introduction and Background - 1990 Version
Every ten years, universities that are members of the Commission on Colleges (COC) of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) must conduct a comprehensive study of their activities and make recommendations for improvements. This process is designed to be broadly participatory and involves faculty, students, administrative officers, staff, and trustees in examining all aspects of the institution, reporting their findings, and making recommendations. When the study is completed, a visiting committee, appointed by SACS, is sent to the university to report on the educational strength of the institution and the thoroughness of its self-study process. The report of the visiting committee serves to guide the university toward improving its programs and to help the COC reach a decision about reaffirmation of the institution's accreditation.
The COC does not grant accreditation to individual components of an institution, but rather accredits the university as a whole. Therefore, an institutional self-study report is not simply a collection of unit or department reports, although these summaries serve as important resource material for the university report. An institutional report must be a reflection of the university's entire educational program, supporting structure, and procedures used to assess the outcomes of this program.
The University of North Carolina at Wilmington completed its last Self-Study in 1982. The 1982 Self-Study Report reflects a University and reaffirmation requirements that are considerably different than those that exist today. During the past eight years, the University experienced tremendous growth in all of its traditional programs, while at the same time adding new ones at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. When comparing the University mission statement of 1982 with that of 1990, one is struck by the increased scope of the University's commitments.
Along with changes in the University have come changes in SACS criteria for reaffirmation of accreditation. We live in a society that increasingly demands accountability for the programs and institutions it supports. Unlike the report of 1982, in which it was acceptable to simply document the University's activities, it is now required that we demonstrate how we are assessing our programs and how the results of this assessment are used to improve these programs. The responsibility for examining how well we evaluate our efforts is not the sole property of any one committee. Rather, every department, every school, and every committee will have to address this issue. To assist departments with assessment planning, the Office of Institutional Research will conduct workshops on outcomes assessment.
This manual describes the rationale, organization, and procedures for the UNCW Self-Study. It should be viewed as a guide to the preparation of reports at all levels. It is expected that additional information and clarification will be required as committees get further into their work. Individual memoranda and the UNCW Self-Study Newsletter will be used to disseminate this information.
Statement of Purposes and Goals - 1990 Version
The purpose of the Self-Study is three-fold. First, it is to examine and evaluate the extent to which UNCW, through its academic programs and administrative processes, approaches the fulfillment of its mission (Appendix A). Second, the process of self-study itself leads to improvement in educational and administrative programs. Finally, the Self-Study provides the means for determining the extent to which the University meets or exceeds the criteria for accreditation established by SACS.
The goals of this Self-Study, which will guide the work of all the committees, are the
ORGANIZATION OF SELF-STUDY - 1990 Version
The model for the organization of the UNCW Self-Study is based on the set of criteria established by SACS for purposes of accreditation. A diagram of this model is shown in Figure 1. The model, developed by the Chair of the Self-Study Steering Committee and the Director of the Self-Study, was approved by the Steering Committee at its first meeting. There is a Section Committee for each major criteria and a Subcommittee for each subcriteria.
Responsibilities of Steering Committee - 1990 Version
The Steering Committee, which is charged with overall supervision of the Self-Study and preparation of the final report, has the following specific responsibilities. It is to
Steering Committee Membership - 2000 Version
Chair: Dr. Kenneth Spackman, Mathematics and Statistics
Editor: Ms. Lavonne Adams, Creative Writing
Dr. Perri Bomar, Associate Dean, School of Nursing, Chair of Section II - Institutional Purpose
Dr. Lee Jackson, Psychology, Chair of Section III - Institutional Effectiveness
Dr. Susan McCaffray, History, Chair of Section IV - Educational Program
Dr. James Reeves, Chemistry, Chair of Section V - Educational Support Services
Dr. Diane Levy, Sociology and Anthropology, Chair of Section VI - Administrative Processes
Dr. Lynne Snowden, President, Faculty Senate
Dr. Melton McLaurin,Associate VC for Academic Affairs and SACS Liaison
Mr. Patrick Gunn, President, Student Government Association
Mr. Robert Fry, Director, Institutional Research
The Section Committees are each chaired by a faculty member from the Steering Committee. Each Subcommittee of a Section Committee is chaired by a member of the Section Committee. In this way, there is an uninterrupted line of communication from each Subcommittee up through the Steering Committee. An editor is assigned to each Section Committee to assist with the preparation of the Section report.
Guidelines for Committees - 1990 Version
Each committee will be responsible for developing the portion of the Self-Study Report indicated by the committee number. The format for these reports is given in the Format and Style Guide found in Appendix C. In order to provide adequate documentation of the Self-Study process, each committee is asked to follow the guidelines listed below.
Section Committee and Subcommittee Membership
Section I: Principles and Philosophy of Accreditation
Chair: Dr. Kenneth Spackman, Mathematics and Statistics
Editor:
Membership: University Self-Study Steering Committee
Section II: Institutional Purpose
Chair: Perri Bomar, School of Nursing
Editor:
Section III: Institutional Effectiveness
Chair: Lee Jackson, Psychology
Editor:
Subcommittee 3.1: Planning and Evaluation: Educational Programs
Chair:
Subcommittee 3.2: Planning and Evaluation: Administrative and Educational Support Services
Chair:
Subcommittee 3.3: Institutional Research
Chair: Nikki Howard, Internal Audit
Section IV: Educational Program
Chair: Susan McCaffray, History
Editor:
Subcommittee 4.1: General Requirements of the Educational Program
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.2: Undergraduate Program
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.3: Graduate Program
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.4: Publications
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.5: Distance Learning Programs
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.6: Continuing Education, Outreach and Service Programs
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.7: Student Records
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.8: Faculty
Chair:
Subcommittee 4.9: Consortial and Contractual Relationships
Chair:
Section V: Educational Support Services
Chair: James Reeves, Chemistry
Editor:
Subcommittee 5.1: Library and Other Learning Resources
Chair:
Student
Subcommittee 5.2: Instructional Support
Chair:
Student
Subcommittee 5.3: Information Technology Resources
Chair:
Subcommittee 5.4: Student Development Services
Chair:
Student
Subcommittee 5.5: Intercollegiate Athletics
Chair:
Section VI: Administrative Processes
Chair: Diane Levy, Sociology and Anthropology
Editor:
Subcommittee 6.1: Organization and Administration
Chair:
Subcommittee 6.2: Institutional Advancement
Chair:
Subcommittee 6.3: Financial Resources
Chair:
Subcommittee 6.4: Physical Resources
Chair:
Subcommittee 6.5: Externally Funded Grants and Contracts
Chair:
Subcommittee 6.6: Related Corporate Entities
Chair:
Schedule of Activities - Modified 1990 Version
The following calendar of events depicts the schedule against which all of the committees are working. This schedule provides adequate time for committees to complete their work while providing some margin for reports that fall slightly behind schedule.
1999 |
|
| Chancellor appoints Self-Study Steering Committee Chairman and Director. | |
|
The Chancellor, in consultation with the Faculty Senate Steering Committee appoints the Self-Study Steering Committee. |
| 2000 | |
| January | Dr. Donna Wilkinson from SACS visits UNCW and meets with the Steering Committee. |
| Appointment of Section II Committee on Institutional Purpose. | |
| Section II Committee conducts survey of faculty, staff, students, alumni, and trustees regarding mission statement. First draft of mission statement prepared. | |
| Successive drafts of mission statement are prepared and reviewed by Section II and the Steering Committee. | |
| UNCW Board of Trustees approves draft of mission statement as the University's official Statement of Purpose. | |
| Section Subcommittee chairs appointed. | |
| Chancellor appoints members of Section Subcommittees. Self-Study Manual distributed to departments. | |
| Development of institutional surveys. Section Committees and Subcommittees gather data and work on reports. | |
| Survey items due from Subcommittees to Section Chairs. | |
| Survey items due to Steering Committee | |
| Institutional surveys administered. | |
| 2001 | |
| Department level reports due to Steering Committee and Deans. | |
| School and College level reports due from Deans to Steering Committee. | |
| Subcommittee reports due to Section Chairs. | |
| First drafts of Section Committee reports due to Steering Committee. | |
| Final drafts of Section Committee reports due to Steering Committee. | |
| Progress report to SACS. | |
| Draft of institutional Self-Study Report prepared. | |
| Draft of Self-Study Report distributed to faculty, students, staff, and alumni. Open forums held to gather input for changes. | |
| Self-Study Report submitted to Editor for preparation of final copy. | |
| Self-Study Report sent to printers for printing and binding. | |
2002 |
|
| Self-Study Report distributed to reporting units and to SACS. | |
| Visit by SACS representative preceding committee visit. | |
| SACS Visiting Committee on campus. | |
| Steering Committee prepares response to SACS visiting team report. |
PROCEDURES FOR SELF-STUDY - 1990 Version
In determining the nature of the processes and procedures for the UNCW Self-Study, it is probably good to keep in mind the essential characteristics that the SACS visiting committee will use to judge the acceptability of our work. The following guidelines were excerpted from the SACS Manual for Accreditation.
All Self-Study reports, from departments to Section Committees, should be prepared with these six statements as governing principles.
UNCW already has in place a substantial planning and reporting process for all units of the University. Units are required to prepare annual reports as well as five and ten year plans. The Office of Institutional Research conducts a host of surveys and compiles vast amounts of data on the University. In addition, many units of the University undergo periodic accreditation reviews by agencies other than SACS. Therefore, rather than reinventing the wheel, departments, schools, colleges, and other units should rely on these existing documents for the basic material from which to build succinct Self-Study reports.
In all probability, this will be the last Self-Study the University will conduct that follows the current format of ten-year cycles. It is the current thinking of SACS that self-study should be an ongoing process with data collected on a regular basis. To this end, departments, schools, colleges, and other units are encouraged to establish long-range planning and assessment committees before starting their individual Self-Studies. These committees should be responsible for planning the unit Self-Study and for establishing procedures for conducting periodic assessment of all programs and practices of the unit. Establishing these committees now will help ensure that UNCW is able to meet or exceed all future requirements and criteria set forth by SACS. In summary, individual unit reports should be
Suggested Outline for Unit Reports - 1990 Version
Each organizational unit that must submit a Self-Study report should prepare the report such that it will be useful to the unit in its day-to-day operation. It should be honest, straightforward, clear, and should candidly identify both the strengths and weaknesses of the unit. It should include plans to solve problems identified or otherwise recommend action to address weaknesses. (Units that have recently completed a self-study for an accrediting body other than SACS may submit an update of that report. However, the report must address the SACS criteria described in section C.) The following items should be discussed, where appropriate.
- Organizational structure of the unit.
- The unit must have a statement of purpose linked to the new mission statement of the University.
- The unit must have a statement of goals compatible with its purpose.
- The unit must have a plan for how its goals are to be achieved.
- The unit must state expected results (that is, specific, identifiable outcomes) of its programs and plans, and it must state how the achievement of those results are to be ascertained. (This means that academic departments must define expected educational results as well as expected outcomes in the areas of research and service.)
- The unit must provide evidence that it regularly evaluates the extent to which its expected results have been achieved, and that such evaluation is used in a flexible, ongoing planning process to cause continual improvement of the effectiveness of the unit.
- The unit must describe how its allocations of budget and personnel are coordinated with its purpose and planning process.
- The unit must identify the person, office, committee, etc., responsible for ensuring that each component of its planning and evaluation process proceeds as described.
- The SACS criteria that each unit must address are listed in the next section under Reporting Units. Each unit Self-Study must determine whether the must statements for these criteria are satisfied by tha unit. Write a brief response to each must statement, unless it has been covered adequately in section A or B above.
- Determine whether each of the relevant should statements is satisfied. Write a brief response to each should statement.
- Prepare a summary of recommendations and/or suggestions for the unit.
- Describe actions that may already have been taken in response to the recommendations and/or suggestions. Include a timetable for addressing recommendations and/or suggestions.
Reporting Units - 1990 Version
The following organizational units will prepare Self-Study reports. This list describes the SACS criteria that must be addressed in each of the reports.
| Organizational Unit | Criteria |
| All academic departments in the College of Arts & Sciences, the Watson School of Education, and the Cameron School of Business Administration. | 3.1, 4.0, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5,
4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 5.5.2.8 (HPER only). Mathematical Sciences and English must respond to the statement on diagnostic testing and remediation of 4.1.1. Programs that have their own admissions requirements must respond to 4.1.1. |
| College of Arts and Sciences (which includes the General College Advising Program, the Office of International Programs, the Science and Mathematics Education Center, and the Marine Science Program) | 3.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5, 4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 4.5, 5.5.2.1 |
| Cameron School of Business Administration (which includes the Center for Economic Education, the Center for Business and Economic Services, and the Center for Small Business and Technology) | 3.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5, 4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 4.5, 5.5.2.1 |
| Watson School of Education (which includes the Consortium for the Advancement of Public Education) | 3.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5, 4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 4.5, 5.5.2.1 |
| The School of Nursing (which includes the RN Access Program) | 3.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.3, 4.4.5, 4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 4.5, 5.5.2.1 |
| The Graduate School | 3.1, 4.2, 4.4.2.3, 4.4.7, 4.4.8, 4.4.9, 4.4.10, 5.5.2.1 |
| Center for Marine Science Research | 3.1, 4.3, 4.4.1, 4.4.5, 4.4.7, 4.4.8,4.5 |
| Information Technology Systems | 3.1,5.4 |
| Office of Library Services | 3.1,5.2 |
| Office of Records | 3.1, 5.5.2.4 |
| Office of Research Administration | 3.1,6.5 |
| Office of Special Programs | 3.1, 4.3, 4.5 |
| Office of Undergraduate Admissions | 3.1, 4.1.1, policies and procedures of admission statement in 4.0 |
| Office of Athletics | 3.1, 5.6 |
| Office of Institutional Research | 3.1, 3.2 |
| Office of Minority Affairs | 3.1, 4.1.1, 5.5.2.1 |
| Office of Compliance | 3.1, 4.1.1, 4.4.1, 6.1.4 |
| Financial Aid | 3.1, 5.5.2.6 |
| Student Development | 3.1, 5.5.1, 5.5.2.1 |
| Student Affairs | 3.1, 5.5.0, 5.5.1, 5.5.2.2, 5.5.2.3, 5.5.2.5, 5.5.2.7 |
| Academic Affairs | 3.1, 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 4.4.4, 5.1.0,6.1 |
| Business Affairs | 3.1, 4.4.3, 6.3, 6.4, financial resources statement of 4.0 |
| University Advancement | 3.1,6.2 |
Resources - Modified 1990 Version
The Provost has designated room 250 in Dobo Hall as the Self-Study Office. A meeting area and space for collecting Self-Study resources have been provided. Secretarial and computer support - Course reductions for Director and Section Chairs - Twelve month contracts for - .
The following resources are available to committees, departments, and other units developing Self-Study reports. These materials will also be available to the SACS visiting committee. Items marked with an asterisk will be provided to each visiting team member. All materials are in the Self-Study Office, _______.
List of Materials normally found in Self-Study office.
Budget Category |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
2000-2002 |
| 1210 SPA Regular Salaries (Secretary III, 0.5) |
|
|
|
| 1810 Social Security |
|
|
|
| 1820 State Retirement |
|
|
|
| 1830 Medical Insurance |
|
|
|
| 1990 Other Contracted Services |
|
|
|
| 2690 Office Supplies |
|
|
|
| 2910 Other Supplies |
|
|
|
| 3100 Travel |
|
|
|
| 3200 Communications |
|
|
|
| 3400 Printing & Binding |
|
|
|
| 3900 Other Current Services |
|
|
|
| 4200 Rental of EDP Equipment |
|
|
|
| 5100 Office Equipment |
|
|
|
| 5200 EDP Equipment |
|
|
|
Totals |
APPENDIX A - Currently Approved Mission
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Concise Statement of Institutional Mission
The University of North Carolina at Wilmington is an evolving comprehensive university dedicated to excellence in teaching, in scholarly and artistic achievement, and in service to regional and global communities. As the only university in the region, it has a special responsibility to education and service. In fulfilling this responsibility, the University recognizes and accepts the primary importance of its undergraduate teaching mission, while at the same time offering strong graduate programs that complement its undergraduate programs. The University seeks to stimulate intellectual curiosity, imagination, rational thinking, thoughtful expression, and love of learning in a broad range of discipline and professional fields. Knowledge of the humanities, the social and natural sciences, and the fine arts is central to this curriculum. The University considers research and creative activities essential for effective learning and strives to create an academic environment in which faculty and students can reach their full potential for scholarship. The University's location in an historic Atlantic seaport provides special opportunities for teaching and research in a variety of fields, among them marine and environmental sciences, the humanities, and business. In its public service role, the University serves as a resource and catalyst for regional growth and development.
Approved by the UNCW Board of Trustees on October 8, 1997
FACULTY COMMITTEE PREFERENCE LETTER - Modified 1990 Version - Not Actual Letter that went to Faculty
MEMORANDUM
| TO: | UNCW Faculty |
| FROM: | Dr. Lynne Snowden, President, Faculty Senate Dr. Kenneth Spackman, Chair, Self-Study Steering Committee |
| SUBJECT: | Self-Study Committee Preference Survey |
| DATE: | November 8, 1999 |
The University of North Carolina at Wilmington is to conduct an institutional self-study during 2000-2002 as part of the requirements for reaffirmation of accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). The self-study process, conducted on a ten year cycle, must be a comprehensive examination of every sector of the University. It culminates in a report which addresses all of the criteria for accreditation established by SACS. A Reaffirmation Committee, appointed by SACS, will visit our campus during the Spring semester of 2002 to review the self-study report and to evaluate the institution. The following is a quote from the Handbook for Peer Evaluators published by SACS.
What constitutes an Adequate Self-Study?
An adequate self-study:
- Is comprehensive. Does the self-study assess every aspect of the institution's operations?
- Is broadly participatory. Did the self-study involve personnel from all segments of the institution?
- Is analytical. Does the self-study provide a complete analysis and critical evaluaiton of the institution, identifying strengths and weaknesses?
- Adequaely examines the planning and evaluation process of the institution.
- Presents recommendations designed to improve the institution.
- Describes adequate procedures for the review and follow-up of recommendations made in the self-study.
This process requires broad faculty involvement on committees ranging from those at the department level to those that are University-wide. The Committee Preference survey is located on the web at the following address: http://www.uncwil.edu/sacs/self_study/comm_pref_survey.htm Information about the focus of each committee's activities is available from this survey instrument or by going to the following address: http://www.uncwil.edu/sacs/self_study/ Please respond to this survey as soon as possible so the Steering Committee can begin the committee assignment process. Failure to complete this survey is no safeguard against being appointed to a self-study committee.
On Thursday, January, January 6, 2000, Dr. Donna Wilkinson, Associate Executive Director, SACS' Commission on Colleges, will visit UNCW to assist us in initiating the self-study. She would like to meet with department chairs and academic and administrative directors in the Randall Library Auditorium at 2:30 P.M.
This formal self-study process and our on-going assessment activities are an integral part of the university's improvement efforts. We look forward to your participation and support on this particular activity during the next three years.
Draft Version of Fall 1999 Committee Preference Survey
STYLE GUIDE FOR SELF-STUDY REPORTS - Modified 1990 Version
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Self-Study
for the
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
Format and Style Guide:
Principal-Committee and Unit Reports
From the Self-Study Editor
Fall, 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
This document is a set of guidelines to style and format to be followed in preparing reports for the Southern Association (SACS) Self-Study. It is intended to guide the reports of both the Principal Committees and the other reporting units such as academic departments and administrative entities.
Reports of the Principal Committees will be combined into a single institutional report, the central document of the Self-Study, so those reports must conform precisely to a prescribed format. Reports of the other units will be available as resources to the Principal Committees and to the SACS team but will not be reprinted in the main document. Consequently, guidelines for the unit reports are more general and allow a greater freedom of choice in formatting and organizational decisions. They may, for example, be composed using any word processing program; Principal Committee reports must use Microsoft Word 97 or higher version only.
Those involved with preparing reports for the Principal Committees and their subcommittees should maintain a close consultation with their section editors throughout the process. They may also consult with me at any time. I can most easily be reached by telephone (extension ______) or e-mail (VAX address: ______).
I have attempted to anticipate editorial questions that reporting units will face, but other questions are bound to arise as the actual task of reporting begins. For that reason, these guidelines should be considered a work in progress, subject to continuing modification as our needs evolve. I have also had to make some arbitrary decisions about style and format, some of which we may want to revise. Please do not hesitate to contact me with your questions or suggestions for change.
___________
Self-Study Editor
SECTION EDITORS
Section I (Principles and Philosophy of Accreditation):
Section II (Institutional Purpose):
Section III (Institutional Effectiveness):
Section IV (Educational Program):
Section V (Educational Support Services):
Section VI (Administrative Processes):
I. STYLE - 1990 Version
This manual is a guide to the form, rather than the content, of SelfStudy reports (guidance to the latter may be found in the Southern Association's Oiteria for Accreditation). Nevertheless, form and content are inextricable, and four general guidelines bear on both. Though they may seem obvious to many, they are important enough to be stated here and emphasized. Each report, and every part of each report, should:
- Say something. It is all too easy to manipulate language into bureaucratic writing. Language in the UNCW Self-Study reports should be the antithesis of bureaucratese. The writing should be straightforward, specific, and concrete-not vague, general, or abstract. Reports should have substance; writers should not hesitate to state their actual meaning.
- Be honest. The report should be balanced, sincere, and candid. The purpose of the Self-Study is objective analysis. It is not a public relations exercise.
- Be clear. Writers who have something to say should shape their message to be clearly understood. They should strive for an unadorned, readable style. They should write to be read by an audience of real readers, much like themselves.
- Be interesting. There is no reason why a formal report cannot be well written, perhaps even lively. The interest which the writers find in their subject should be communicated to their readers.
However careful the investigation or however penetrating the analysis, those efforts will not be successful unless the report is substantive, truthful, clear, and well written-that is, worthy of being attentively read.
Reports are written by committees. Component sections of reports are often produced by different subcommittees or individuals, with each section reflecting the style and approach of its authors. It is the task of the reporting unit as a whole, and of its chair and its editor in particular, to synthesize and edit the report so that the finished document has unity, its component sections function together, and the entire report reads as if it were the work of a single hand.
Self-Study reports will observe standard conventions of syntax and usage, including spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and abbreviation. Such reference tools as a college handbook and a dictionary can answer questions in these areas. General stylistic guidelines for Self-Study reports are as follows:
- Use
standard written English, avoiding the extremes of stuffy formality and colloquial informality.- Write in the third person.
For example, write "the University's policy," rather than "our policy."- Write objectively.
Avoid personal opinion in descriptive writing. Passages of analysis, evaluation, and recommendations should be clearly recognizable as such.- Avoid wordiness.
- Express numerical data visually,
in the form of graphs and tables. Do not write lengthy prose descriptions of data that can be presented more clearly and accessibly in graphic form.
II. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT - 1990 Version
Committee reports for the Self-Study should be organized to include the following in the order shown:
Title page
Table of contents
List of figures
List of tables
Summary
The report proper
Summary Recommendations/Suggestions
Introduction
First major heading
Second major heading
...
Appendixes
Topics listed in the table should be the titles given exactly as in your report, but use upper and lower case and do not underline or use bold face. Indent each successive level one-half inch. Topic 1 should be Introduction. Topic 2 is the first major heading of the report. For the Principal Committees, all headings and subheadings specified in Criteria for Accreditation should appear as headings and subheadings in your report, with the number following in parentheses; e.g.:
2. Undergraduate Program (4.1) 7
Undergraduate Admission (4.1.1) 9
Minority Policies 14
Finally, type APPENDIXES, and list them in the same manner.
Place the number following the heading or subheading in parentheses; e.g.:
2
Organization and Administration (4.1)
While all the headings and subheadings in Ctiteria for Accreditation should appear in the reports, you are not limited to them. You may add other headings, subheadings, and sub-subheadings as desired.
Only the main headings will be numbered. Avoid numbering or lettering (except for lists) beyond these major section numbers; instead, use the form for subheadings, sub-subheadings, and sub-sub-subheadings as shown in Figure 4. A list is shown in Figure 5.
6
Skip three additional lines from the top margin.
2
Skip one line.
ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (6.1)
Skip two lines.
The first line of each new paragraph, including the first, is indented one-half inch from the left margin. The summary and each numbered heading (as listed in the Table of Contents; see Figure 2) begin a new page. Center that number (omit in the case of the summary), skip a line, and type the heading in all caps. Both the number and heading are in bold.
Do not skip a line between paragraphs within a section. Skip two lines before a new subsection or sub-subsection.
Skip two lines.
Descriptive Titles and Terms (6.1.1)
Skip one line.
Skip one line between a subsection title and its text. Subsection titles are centered in upper and lower case bold. The subsection number from Criteria for Accreditation is placed in parentheses following the title. In the case of Principal Committee reports, all section and subsection titles listed in Criteria for Accreditation must appear in the report, but the committee is not limited to those titles. Additional titles for sections, subsections, and sub-subsections should be added as needed.
Skip two lines.
Sub-Subsection Heading (6.1.1.1)
Skip one line.
Sub-subsection headings are placed flush left. They are printed in upper and lower case and are not in bold type. Skip two lines before and one line after each sub-subsection heading.
Remember not to skip lines between adjacent paragraphs.
Skip one line.
A Fourth-Level Heading Skip one line before a fourth-level (sub-subsubheading). Type it flush left, in upper and lower case letters, underlined but not bold. Do not end it with a period. Skip two spaces and begin text.
7
If it is necessary to list information, indent as below and use Arabic numbers:
Skip one line.
- Skip a line and begin the first item one-half inch from the left margin. The second and subsequent lines are similarly indented. Do not indent additional space from the right margin.
- For brief items, do not skip additional lines between numbered items.
- For longer items, especially those consisting of more than one paragraph, one line may be skipped between items. A second paragraph within an item is indented as in this example.
Skip one line.
Skip a line following the last item, and resume typing the text of the report.
103
Skip three additional lines from the top margin.
Center and type in bold:
APPENDIX A - 1990 Version
Skip one line.
LIST OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Skip three lines.
Appendixes may contain text, graphic material, tables, and so on. Subheadings may be provided as for the report proper. Each new appendix begins a new page. Graphic matter may be placed sideways if needed to fit the page. If so, place it so that the matter can be read if the page is rotated clockwise 90 degrees.
III. USAGE - 1990 Version
Do not use any of the following: UNC-W, UNC at Wilmington, UNC-Wilmington, North Carolina-Wilmington. In Self-Study reports, the article the preceding the University's name will not begin with a capital letter unless it is the first word of a sentence.
Avoid confusion between UNCW and the parent UNC system. The latter may be designated as "the University of North Carolina system" or "the 16-campus University of North Carolina" or "the parent UNC system." The term "the University" will refer to UNCW, but do not use it in situations where its referent is ambiguous.
(Author, Title, city: publisher, year: pages)
And this form for periodicals:
(Author, "Title," Periodical, volume-if-applicable, date: pages)
For example:
innovative approaches (Peter Seldin et al, How Administrators Can Improve Teaching, San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1990: 126-28).
Any elements mentioned in the text are not repeated in the parenthetical note:
On page 44 of Forest Society (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990), Norman B. Schwartz demonstrates that Initial references can establish an abbreviated title for subsequent reference:
Initial references can establish an abbreviated title for subsequent references:
Illustrations and interpretations for Section IV are discussed on pages 15-30 of Criteria for Accreditation (Commission on Colleges, 6th edition, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, 1989-1990, hereafter referred to as Criteria).
Subsequent references are brief:
Advisory committees (Criteria, 37) should be
Or:
The guidelines in Criteria reflect
The following are typical references for:
- A book:
(Arthur M. Hauptman, The College Tuition Spiral, New York: Macmillan, 1991: 46)- A
book with an editor or translator: (Lisa Williams, editor, The Grants Register 1991-1993, 12th edition, New York: St. Martin's, 1991: 764-77)- A
book in an edition: See the previous example.- A
journal article: (Frederick Bartheleme, "Architecture," Kansas Quarterly, volume 13, 1981: 77-78).- A
newspaper or magazine article: (Chris Raymond, "Engineers Urged to Heed History of Their Field," Chronicle of Higher Education, October 10, 1990: A10)- A
work with two or three authors: (Mary Smith, Thomas Jones, and Jane Brown, . . .)- A
work with more than three authors: (Robert White et al, . . .)
These examples form a representative - but not a comprehensive - set. Authors should improvise on the models as necessary to provide essential information within their parenthetical notes.
Self-Study (as the proper name for the present study)
Director of the Self-Study (used as a title)
most directors of self-studies
the Self-Study Report (the central document of our Self-Study)
the Self-Study reports (the various department and other reports)
self-study reports on other campuses
Sherman Hayes, Director of Library Services
the Department of History
history departments throughout the country
Fall Semester 1998 (or Fall 1998)
Spring Semester 2000 (or Spring 2000)
in the fall of 2000; during the spring semester
a.m. and p.m. (rather than A.M. and P.M.)
Committee VI: Administrative Processes
Self-Study
part-time, full-time
on-campus
non-traditional, non-degree, non-credit
two-thirds, one-half
No hyphen is used in these:
vice president, vice chancellor
extracurricular
intervarsity, intramural
Supply a hyphen for a phrase used as a modifier: three-credit course (but "three credit hours") Wilmington-area physicians (but "in the Wilmington area")
IV. UNIT REPORTS: LAYOUT AND FORMAT - 1990 Version
All reports should have an appealing, professional-looking appearance. The unit reports (reports of departments and other administrative units) will be available as resources to the Principal Committees and SACS team but will not be reprinted in the central document. Consequently the unit reports are subject to more general guidelines than those of the Principal Committees (the latter guidelines are presented in Chapter V).
Other header items besides the page number are optional. For example, the unit name or the current section heading may be placed as a header, on the same line but in the opposite corner from the page number; such headers, however, are not essential.
- Paragraphs
Indent the first line of each new paragraph one-half inch. Do not begin any new paragraph at the left margin.
- Long quotations
Extensive quotations (longer than three lines of text) should be indented as follows:
Long quotations are indented one inch from the left margin. They should not be indented additionally from the right margin. Quotation marks are not used for indented quotations. Do not skip an extra line before or after a long quotation.
- Hanging indents
A hanging indent is used when listing a work in a bibliography. The second and subsequent lines are indented one-half inch from the left margin.
Figures and tables should follow closely upon the first reference to them. They are referred to in the text directly-e.g., "Figure 9 shows projected costs for child care." They can also be referred to parenthetically- e.g., ". . . child care expenditures (see Figure 9)."
Figure 3 on page 6 illustrates how figures are placed and labelled. Each figure should be labeled with a figure number and title, centered below the figure; for example:
Figure 11. Departmental Organizational Chart
Source references, if necessary, should be given in parentheses on the following line. Do not use footnotes.
Figure 12. Percentage Change in College Enrollment: 1978 to 1988
(The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac, September 5, 1990: 8)
Labels for tables are centered above the table:
Table 2
Names Centered above the Table
in as Many Lines as Necessary
(documentation, if necessary, in parentheses)
Placing a border around a figure or table (i.e., placing it within a box, as done with the figures in this document) is optional.
When you position matter sideways, it should take up the entire page; no other matter should appear on the same page (except for the page number, which is not printed sideways). An exception is when matter is printed sideways on the first page of an appendix. The appendix letter and title are still printed normally (in "portrait" orientation); matter can then be positioned sideways below it.
V. PRINCIPAL COMMITTEE REPORTS: LAYOUT, FORMAT, AND WORD PROCESSING SPECIFICATIONS - 1990 Version
Each of the six Principal Committee reports must be submitted to the Editor, both in draft and final form, as a Microsoft Word 97 or higher document. It may be submitted either on floppy disk or via e-mail. Two hard copies of the report (one single-spaced and one double-spaced for ease of editing, and printed on a laser printer) should also be sent to the Editor. Contact the Editor (e-mail address: _______) for directions for submitting a file via e-mail. Section chairs and editors are welcome to consult with the Editor about any editorial or wordprocessing matter. Each of the six reports will be bound separately, with its own cover. Taken together, they will comprise our institutional report, the central document of the Self-Study. It is essential that each conform precisely to the specified format. Moreover, some global changes (such as font conversions) that will be made in the final stages will alter the appearance and page-placement of text, so editors must avoid idiosyncratic practices that could become garbled during conversions. The Self-study Editor will supply report templates to Principal Committee Editors.
Keep your format as clean and simple as possible. The general guidelines in Chapter IV apply to the Principal Committee reports as well, with the following adjustments and directions:
- From the document, select the Page Setup item from the File Menu.
- Set the Left and right margins to 1.25".
- Set the top margin to 1.0".
- Set the bottom margin to 1.0".
Keep page numbering simple during the composing stages. All pages will be numbered consecutively, with the title page as page 1. When the final document is ready for printing, the Editor will make adjustments so that no number appears on the title page and prefatory pages have Roman numerals. Do not make these adjustments yourself.
- Paragraphs
Indent each new paragraph one-half inch. Always use a tab to indent, never the space bar.
- Long quotations
Extensive quotations (longer than three lines of text) should be indented as follows: Long quotations are indented one inch from the left margin. They should not be indented additionally from the right margin. They are achieved in WordPerfect by pressing Indent (F4) twice. Quotation marks are not used for indented quotations. Do not skip an extra line before or after a long quotation.
- Hanging indents
A hanging indent is used when listing a work in a bibliography. The second and subsequent lines are indented one-half inch from the left margin. A hanging indent is achieved in MS Word as follows: using the ruler at the top of the screen, locate the downward pointing margin marker and move it to the preferred location for the first line of the hanging indent. Locate the upward point arrow of the margin marker and move it one half inch to the right of the downward pointing arrow. Type your text and note whether or not your text appears as expected. If not go back and adjust the arrows till you receive the expected results.
Updates on word processing specifications will be issued as new questions and needs arise.
Return to 1990 SACS Self-Study Materials Homepage
Last Updated: February 3, 2000